If you’ve worked in SEO, you must have heard the words “strategy” and “tactics” thrown around as if they mean the same thing. They don’t. Strategy is the “why.” Tactics are the “how.”
Here’s the thing: in most organizations, SEO is still seen as tactical. Fixing metadata, chasing backlinks, tweaking Core Web Vitals. But now, with generative AI reshaping how search works, that blurry line isn’t just a semantic debate. It’s the difference between growth and stagnation.
If you don’t know whether you’re making a strategic choice or just executing a tactic, your SEO program is at risk of collapsing under its own weight. You’ll chase the wrong KPIs, burn budget on busywork, and get blindsided when AI-driven search platforms rewrite the rules overnight.
Strategy vs Tactics: The Simple Framework
The fastest way to untangle this is to stop overcomplicating it.
- Strategy is direction. It’s deciding to compete on authority, not on volume. It’s choosing enterprise clients over SMBs. It’s planning to dominate generative AI results instead of only chasing Google’s top ten.
- Tactics are execution. They’re the specific actions: producing in-depth thought leadership, adding schema markup, running content clusters, or optimizing for retrieval in ChatGPT or Perplexity.
Both matter. But here’s the difference: strategy survives algorithm shifts. Tactics expire the moment platforms change.
Think of it like cricket. The strategy is to build pressure through spin. The tactics are which bowler you pick, which field placement you set, how you rotate overs. You can swap out tactics, but the strategy is the plan holding them together.
A Quick History of SEO: Strategy vs Tactics Through the Years
To understand why this distinction feels muddy, you have to see how SEO evolved.
2000–2005: The Wild West
Back then, tactics dominated. Keyword stuffing, link farms, directory submissions. Strategy wasn’t even in the conversation. The internet was still a land grab.
2006–2010: The Rise of Google Discipline
With updates like Florida and Penguin, the first real “strategy” discussions began. Companies realized they couldn’t just spam keywords. They had to decide what role SEO played in the business model.
2011–2015: The Content Marketing Wave
Hummingbird and RankBrain made intent the centerpiece. Smart brands developed strategies around thought leadership, inbound traffic, and owning niches. Tactics shifted to long-form content, pillar pages, and better user experience.
2016–2020: Mobile-First and SERP Diversification
This era introduced featured snippets, voice search, and mobile-first indexing. Strategies had to consider device ecosystems and cross-channel discovery. Tactics included AMP, FAQ schema, and structured snippets.
2020–2025: Generative AI and the Search Collapse
This is where we are now. Google’s Search Generative Experience (SGE), Bing Copilot, Perplexity, ChatGPT with browsing — these platforms don’t just rank results. They generate answers. Strategy now means asking: how do we become the trusted source AI systems pull from? Tactics are things like content chunking, retrieval testing, semantic density, and entity optimization.
Why SEO Is Still Seen as Tactical
Here’s a truth most SEOs don’t like to admit: in many companies, SEO still reports into marketing execution layers, not strategy teams. That means leadership only sees the outputs: fixing broken links, compressing images, writing title tags.
But behind the scenes, SEOs are often making strategic calls: which markets to target, which customer journeys to optimize, which competitors to benchmark against. The problem is they don’t communicate those decisions in strategic language.
Other functions don’t make this mistake.
- Sales: Strategy is choosing enterprise vs SMB; tactics are cold calls vs account-based marketing.
- PR: Strategy is brand positioning; tactics are press releases and journalist pitches.
SEO: Too often, everything is labeled as “doing SEO.” That lack of clarity keeps the discipline boxed in.
Generative AI: The Great Disruptor
The rise of generative AI has forced SEO leaders to rethink everything. Search is no longer just a list of links. It’s conversational, context-driven, and answer-first.
Key platforms to watch:
- Google SGE: Generative answers blended into SERPs.
- Bing Copilot: Pulls data from web sources into contextual AI responses.
- ChatGPT Browsing + GPT-5 integration: Answers + citations.
- Perplexity: A retrieval-focused AI search tool, increasingly popular with professionals.
Strategic questions companies must now answer:
- Do we aim for broad visibility across all platforms or focus on dominating one?
- Should we invest in being the “source of truth” in a niche rather than chasing keywords?
- How do we build authority signals that AI systems recognize?
Tactical adjustments:
- Structuring content for retrieval.
- Testing how AI tools respond to prompts in your niche.
- Increasing semantic density with entity-based optimization.
- Using schema markup not just for Google, but for AI parsers.
Indian Brand Case Studies: Strategy vs Tactics in Action
Zomato
Zomato’s strategy has always been about owning food discovery at scale. Their SEO isn’t just about ranking for “best restaurants in Delhi.” They built a system where every restaurant page became a landing page optimized for long-tail queries. That’s strategic foresight.
Tactics: dynamic metadata, UGC-driven reviews, city-based landing pages. The tactics changed, but the strategy of “own food discovery” held steady.
Nykaa
Nykaa’s strategy is about dominating intent-based searches in beauty. Instead of chasing just “lipstick,” they went after “best matte lipstick for Indian skin tone” and every other micro-intent.
Tactics: buying guides, influencer-led content, structured product reviews.
Byju’s
Byju’s had the strategic goal of owning education SEO. Early on, they targeted broad “learning app” queries but didn’t build tactical consistency. Their strategy was strong, but execution faltered in later years as competition intensified.
PolicyBazaar
PolicyBazaar shows what balance looks like. Their strategy is clear: be the default online insurance marketplace. Their tactics — comparison pages, FAQ optimization, structured financial calculators — all serve that north star.
Unacademy
Unacademy leaned tactical-heavy: cranking out keyword-driven content. They captured some short-term traffic but struggled to sustain authority. It’s a classic case of tactics without long-term strategy.
Frameworks to Separate Strategy from Tactics
One useful way to explain this to leadership is the SEO Pyramid:
- Top: Strategy (brand positioning, audience, competitive advantage)
- Middle: Systems (content architecture, authority-building, distribution models)
- Base: Tactics (technical fixes, schema, link outreach, keyword mapping)
If leadership understands this pyramid, SEO stops being seen as “the team that fixes meta tags” and starts being viewed as “the function that drives digital direction.”
A Practical Playbook for 2025
Here’s a step-by-step process you can actually use.
- Define the business objective first. Growth? Trust? Lead gen? Market dominance?
- Map the customer journey, not just keywords.
- Pick a strategic angle: authority, scale, niche dominance, or innovation.
- Audit competitor strategies, not just tactics.
- Align your content pillars with strategic goals.
- Translate strategy into tactical sprints (technical + content + distribution).
- Test retrieval in generative AI tools.
- Track KPIs at two levels: strategy (share of voice, brand authority) and tactics (rankings, clicks, speed).
- Communicate to executives in strategic language.
- Review quarterly — because in AI-driven SEO, 12-month roadmaps age fast.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Calling every fix “strategy.” If you’re adjusting a meta title, that’s a tactic.
- Over-focusing on Google only. Generative AI platforms are already cannibalizing searches.
- Ignoring EEAT (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Without EEAT, AI systems won’t trust you.
Copying competitors’ tactics without understanding their strategy.
Predictions: Where SEO Heads by 2030
- Generative AI will account for 40–50% of “search-like” queries.
- SEO teams will evolve into Search + Retrieval Optimization teams.
- Indian brands that win will be those that use strategy as the compass: Zomato in food, Nykaa in beauty, PolicyBazaar in finance.
- Tactical SEO roles will still exist but as execution arms of strategy-first organizations.
Internal Resources You Can Explore
- How small businesses can win with AI-powered content creation
- Why customers abandon shopping carts and how to fix it
- How to get repeat customers without ads
- Why most SaaS tools fail to keep users
- The 80/20 rule for SEO
- How to write content Google loves without sounding like a robot
- Advanced behavioral targeting strategies
External Learning Resources
For deeper dives, check out:
Final Word
Here’s what this all boils down to: Strategy decides where you play and why. Tactics decide how you play and win. In SEO, both matter, but only one survives the constant platform shifts.
Generative AI has raised the stakes. You can’t afford to confuse execution with direction anymore. Indian brands like Zomato, Nykaa, and PolicyBazaar prove the point: strategy is what makes you last, tactics are what keep you competitive in the moment.
If your SEO team is still treated as tactical executors, it’s time to rewrite the narrative. Speak the language of strategy, then back it up with smart tactical execution. That’s how you stay relevant in 2025 and beyond.
Leave a Reply